[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Price discrimination for academic subscriptions (discussion)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Price discrimination for academic subscriptions (discussion)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:20:28 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> This leads me to my question: will academia as a whole benefit more in a > fixed price market, or a price discriminatory market? Unfortunately this, in turn, begs an important question of its own: How can we know whether "academia as a whole" is benefiting? Suppose the whole academic publishing marketplace adopts a pricing structure that hurts small colleges, but greatly benefits large research universities? Has "academia as a whole" been helped or hurt in that case? How about a pricing structure that reverses that effect, making it possible for small and poorly-funded institutions to buy all kinds of great stuff, but leaving large institutions unable to buy the same stuff? How do you evaluate the effect on "academia as a whole" in that case? > I realize > again that I'm posing some questions that may not be completely > answerable, but will pose these anyway for discussion. I think the problem with these questions isn't so much that they're unanswerable in any absolute sense, but that they're unanswerable in the form that you're posing them. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Lawmakers to Weigh Database Protection Bill
- Next by Date: HARRASSOWITZ NEWS No. 72
- Previous by thread: RE: Price discrimination for academic subscriptions (discussion)
- Next by thread: Re: Price discrimination for academic subscriptions (discussion)
- Index(es):