[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright protection paper
- To: <sec-gen@alpsp.org>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: copyright protection paper
- From: "Marc Brodsky" <brodsky@aip.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:05:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Many publishers are actually in the business of selling well-known public domain material, e.g., a book of Shakespeare's plays. It is legitimate to charge for such a book. Some people and libraries actually might buy it and read a well written, well printed play. If someone wants to look elsewhere for the public domain material, he/she can do so. If he/she wants to make a free extra copy of the book, then it gets murky. It depends on, among other things, what original expressive value the publisher added to the particular edition of the book, which likely will have a copyright claim printed by the publisher. Journal publishers typically add some value and expression to material (whether public domain or not) in vetting, editing, composing, branding, dating, page design, etc. You may or may not want to pay for it and go look for another copy of the original public domain material (if you can find an authentic version), or make copies of the published journal and then discuss with publisher how far the publisher's copyright extends to the particular expression you copied and how that might affect the future viability of the journal you might want to still buy and read at an affordable price in the future. Marc Brodsky >>> sec-gen@alpsp.org 09/05/03 07:52AM >>> From: sec-gen@alpsp.org Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 7:52 AM To: Liblicense" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Subject: Re: copyright protection paper I don't see that publishers have no right to collect payment for articles they have published, irrespective of their copyright status. As Ann Okerson points out, they have done work and expended money on all the processes leading to publication - if they didn't get paid for this, how would they continue to perform that function? And I don't think the issue is really whether or not the reader knows that the work is in the public domain (in the USA, at least - I agree with comments that the same works may not in fact be public domain for users in other countries). The author knows - or should know - and, to me, the question is whether they (or their employer) actually do anything about it. Are Govt works habitually openly deposited anywhere? Not that I know of Sally Morris, Secretary-General Phone: 01903 871686 Fax: 01903 871457 E-mail: sec-gen@alpsp.org ALPSP Website http://www.alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Public Access to Sciences Act (Sabo Bill, H.R. 2613)
- Next by Date: RE: Price discrimination for academic subscriptions (discussion)
- Previous by thread: RE: copyright protection paper
- Next by thread: Re: copyright protection paper
- Index(es):