[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- From: "Sally Morris" <sec-gen@alpsp.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:45:59 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It's a standard clause in the 'Model Licence' developed jointly by publishers and university librarians in the UK Sally Morris, Secretary-General Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Phone: 01903 871686 Fax: 01903 871457 E-mail: sec-gen@alpsp.org ALPSP Website http://www.alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:45 AM Subject: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages >Perhaps you need a clause in your contract allowing for a prorated refund >in the event access is not possible due to circumstances within the >publisher's or vendor's control? If you lose access a quarter of the >time, why not ask for a quarter of your money back? __
- Prev by Date: RE: Cataloguing open access
- Next by Date: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Previous by thread: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Next by thread: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Index(es):