[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:45:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Perhaps you need a clause in your contract allowing for a prorated refund > in the event access is not possible due to circumstances within the > publisher's or vendor's control? If you lose access a quarter of the > time, why not ask for a quarter of your money back? I push for such language in our licenses on a regular basis, almost always successfully. As long as I emphasize that I'm not going to ask for a _full_ refund, but only a refund for the amount of product that I paid for up front but didn't end up getting, they usually agree. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries "Perfect clarity is the University of Nevada, Reno ultimate style. A sentence 1664 No. Virginia St. should be as lean as an Reno, NV 89557 equation." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- David Quammen FX (775) 784-1328 (paraphrasing Russell) rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Next by Date: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Previous by thread: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Next by thread: Re: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Index(es):