[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libraries Urge Justice Departmen to Block Cinven and Candover
- To: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btopenworld.com>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Libraries Urge Justice Departmen to Block Cinven and Candover
- From: "Barbara Schader" <bschader@library.ucla.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:37:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I can't speak to whether or not the G&B titles became more expensive when Taylor & Francis purchased them (tho' I doubt they did) but I can say that the G&B titles were already outrageously overpriced and most of the time G&B was a year or two or more behind in their publishing schedule so libraries had faithfully paid for things they were not getting for a year or so - but would consistently be billed year after year as tho' the publishing schedule was on time. G&B also used the business model of suddenly labelling issues as volumes to compensate for their publishing arrears. Many of us had dropped all G&B subscriptions due to their publishing practices and so we were thrilled when G&B journals were purchased by T&F. I think this is an exceptional situation and does not fit into the current discussion. Or perhaps it is the exception that proves the rule? Barbara Schader UCLA Biomedical Library ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btopenworld.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Libraries Urge Justice Departmen to Block Cinven and Candover > Having made the statement earlier that McCabe's thesis falls down if he > assumes an inexorable link between purchase and price rises, it is clearly > not enough to explain that this is not my own experience and I hope to be > able to produce evidence (in time!) to back up my assertion. This would be > evidence to back up my own memory of what was done by Chapman & Hall - > nothing more general. > > However an example of a purchase that did not result in price rises has > been pointed out to me: it is the purchase of Gordon & Breach by Taylor & > Francis. I have not checked this and indeed (as an independent researcher) > it is very difficult for me to do so, but perhaps someone on this list > could see if I am correct in assuming that Gordon & Breach prices were not > put up dramatically by their new owners.
- Prev by Date: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Next by Date: RoMEO Publisher Copyright Transfer policy listing
- Previous by thread: Re: Libraries Urge Justice Departmen to Block Cinven and Candover
- Next by thread: E-Learning: Intellectual Property
- Index(es):