[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reporter faked the news
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Reporter faked the news
- From: Janellyn P Kleiner <jkleiner@lsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:08:12 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Knowing Chuck's views, I have watched this chat with interest. I am a former newspaper reporter even though it was only on the Baton Rouge Advocate. The NY Times is a business corporation first and foremost. It is there to provide the "news of the day" via an instrument supported primarily by advertising. It is not there to serve as an historical record. This is a burden which has been transferred to journalists and the press whether they wanted it or not. I have always had problems with history because too much of it is based on newspapers. Newspapers can never be totally accurate because they are composed of information rapidly collected and articles rapidly produced by humans under immediate deadlines. No daily newspaper hits the streets without errors of one type or another --- even if only errors of omission. Reporters have a power of sorts --- the power to capture in words and portray for the public happenings of major interest. This power carries with it responsibility to the newspaper that employees them and the public who reads their accounts. Good reporters know that their job is to produce accurate and objective portrayals. You don't see a lot of this today when sensational journalism predominates. The NYT case merely magnifies what can happen when an unethical, irresponsible reporter is given free reign. He was neither too young nor too inexperienced to know right from wrong. I am appalled by the editors who allowed this to continue when the trust between an editor and reporter had already been abrogated. I understand how busy newsrooms can be and how errors can happen but not fallacious reporting over this many years? This happened when I was on the paper here and that reporter was fired immediately. Something else was at play at the NYT in addition to a journalist who may have a future in the fiction market. He did have a flare for writing and "creating news". You don't need to worry about the record being maintained. As someone else said, and I hope they are correct, this case will, or should, be taught in all future journalism ethics courses-----the NYT case and several similar incidents at other papers. Freedom of the press does not convey the right to report unsubstantiated and false accounts.
- Prev by Date: Non-English Language Licensing Agreement?
- Next by Date: Kluwer Announces Digital Archive Project with National Library
- Previous by thread: Non-English Language Licensing Agreement?
- Next by thread: Reporter faked the news
- Index(es):