[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Elsevier position on Subscripton Agents
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Elsevier position on Subscripton Agents
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:24:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
FYI. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:43:19 +0100 From: "Menefee, Daviess (ELS)" <D.Menefee@elsevier.com> To: "'reedelscustomers@lists.cc.utexas.edu'" Subject: Elsevier position on Subscripton Agents Dear Readers, Recently there were several questions posted to this list concerning Elsevier's position regarding subscription agents. I hope to clarify this. As most of the readers here already know, Elsevier has taken the position to work directly with customers who purchase the electronic version of their journals. This policy has been consistent since the introduction of ScienceDirect in 1998. Over the course of time, however, some libraries asked Elsevier to allow invoicing and payment via agents for electronic products. Elsevier has agreed to this process provided there is mutual consent by all parties beforehand and a single subscription agent is involved. For print formats, Elsevier continues to work with subscription agents and encourages libraries to maintain their agent relationships for print delivery. Kind regards, Daviess Menefee Library Relations
- Prev by Date: Update on the NTIS-Dialog Customer Migration Process
- Next by Date: Wiley and The Cochrane Collaboration Form Publishing Partnership
- Previous by thread: Update on the NTIS-Dialog Customer Migration Process
- Next by thread: Wiley and The Cochrane Collaboration Form Publishing Partnership
- Index(es):