[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- From: Larry Alford <alford@email.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:08:51 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In North Carolina we cannot agree by state law to confidentiality clauses. We can and do add phrases such as "To the extent permitted by North Carolina Law" or "Except as required by the NC Public Records Act" if the vendor refuses to strike the entire clause. Such phrases largely gut the clause. Such phrases do, however, require us to follow the procedures outlined in the Public Records Act in order to disclose information about the contract. By the way, OCLC has always agreed to such changes as have all other vendors and publishers with whom we have signed licenses. If a vendor did not agree, we could not by law sign the license. There are other provisions of state law governing contracts of state agencies in North Carolina and in almost all other states that are also deal breakers. Governing law and legal jurisdiction is one example. Companies ususally understand those requirements of state governments and agree to strike, change, or work around them. Larry P. Alford Deputy University Librarian University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB #3900 Davis Library Chapel Hill, NC 27514-8890 alford@email.unc.edu (919) 962-1302 fax:(919) 843-8936
- Prev by Date: RE: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- Next by Date: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Previous by thread: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Next by thread: RE: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Index(es):