[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- From: "Peter Picerno" <ppicerno@nova.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:06:05 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
"the other academics argued that we must buy those journals, because they are the top journals of our field. Some of my colleagues were on the editorial boards of those very journals." -- BINGO! This says it all ... the people who promote publication, publication in 'top' journals, and who make promotion and tenure decisions are very often the same people who sit on editorial boards for these journals. This is not *all* of the problem, certainly, but it certainly has an impact on the problem. One could argue that there is a certain amount of vested interest exhibited here. Peter Picerno -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu]On Behalf Of Fytton Rowland Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:41 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit) This is about the authorship end of the process, not the library purchase end - one of the key problems that reformers of the scientific communication process have always faced is the lack of linkage between the two that exists within institutions. It is the academic leadership of the university (specifically, in our case, the Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research) who insists on publication in the leading journals. If open access journals had the impact factor I don't suppose he'd mind us using them, but they don't, do they? It is a chicken-and-egg problem. Meanwhile, it is the University Librarian, guided by advice from academic departments, who decides what journals (or big deals) to buy. I don't think she "happily" pays the high prices involved! Within the Information Science department I tried to argue, some years ago, that the dept should ask the Librarian to cut some exorbitantly priced journals in our field. I was in a minority of one - the other academics argued that we must buy those journals, because they are the top journals of our field. Some of my colleagues were on the editorial boards of those very journals. I imagine most universities are still like this. Fytton.
- Prev by Date: Kluwer announcement
- Next by Date: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Previous by thread: RE: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- Next by thread: Re: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- Index(es):