[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:04:50 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <200301170410.h0H4ACa00646@quickgr.its.yale.edu>
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David: I'm not sure I fully understand the argument below. I do understand that in a particular year, ISI reported that Yale authors published 4648 articles (as indexed in ISI's WoS presumably) and that in that same year Yale reported that it spent $10M on serials. But how does that equate with each Yale article being worth over $2K to repurchase? That is, for that $10M, the library is buying journals, newspapers, annuals, databases, e-aggregations and services, tons of microform subscriptions, art images, and much much more -- *and* indeed we are buying tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of articles more than those that our faculty publish. So, I need some help in following the thread below. Many thanks, Ann Okerson/Yale Library-Collections Development On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David Goodman wrote: > I gave some figures for this earlier, but these are considerably more > reliable numbers, -- but see below for notes about limitations of the > analysis. > > Cost of serials to libraries: > > Columbia: $7.14 million serials expenditure, 5838 articles, $1223 each > Cornell: $6.20 million, 4804 articles, $1290 each > Dartmouth, $3.89 million, 1034 articles, $3720 each > Princeton, $5.45 million, 2692 articles, $2025 each > Stanford, $11.26 million, 5838 articles, $ 1930 each > Yale, $10 million, 4648 articles, $2169 each > > Potential savings if articles cost $500: > Columbia: $3.71 million > Cornell, $3.36 million > Dartmouth, $2.42 million > Princeton, $3.31 million > Stanford, $7.33 million > Yale, $6.44 million > > If articles cost $1500, Columbia & Cornell would pay more, the others > less. > > I did not adust for the cost of submission fes now being paid by the > researchers. The cost given is just the cost to the library. > > Number of articles: number of articles published from the university > listed in 2001, according to ISI. Includes Science, social science, and > humanities sections. Does not include what isn't in themError here may be > large in number of humanities articles etc, because of the spotty coverage > of ISI, but this should be balanced by the low cost of journals in those > fields. > > Includes main university > #NAME? > For Princeton, does include Plasma Physics Lab, for others, will people > who know the local setup please verify. My guess at the likely error here > from my not checking properly is plus or minus 25%, except for Princeton, > which should be correct. > > o The budgets are the 2000-2001 ARL numbers. (www.arl.org) > o I did not check whether they include the med schools in all cases. > o Whether they include electronic resources is unclear. > o Whether they include electronic resources other than journals is > unclear. > o The ARL data starts with whatever the library reported for serials, > using the 1995 standard, adjusted by me , based on what the library > reported for"computer files" and for "other materials" > o There was no category for electronic journals. > > I make no claim to have done this adjustment right. (The new standard > will clarify this in the future.) My guess at the likely error here from > my misinterpretation is plus or minus 25%. My guess at the possible error > is of course larger. > > Note: > Division by field: > Columbia: 5126 sci, 540 soc sci, 172 human. > Cornell, 4253 sci, 417 soc sci, 134 human > Dartmouth, 688 sci, 279 soc sci, 67 human > Princeton, 2169 sci, 251 soc sci, 272 human > Stanford, 5126 sci, 540 soc sci, 172 human > Yale, 3857 sci, 522 soc sci, 269 human > > These numbers depend a lot on the vagaries of ISI-- and of course is only > journal articles. There is some very small overlap in psychology between > sci and soc sci, (not considered) otherwise almost none. I did not > attempt to obtain figures on the percent of serials cost in each subject. > > If you use, please understand that any impression of precion is purely > spurious. > > Dr. David Goodman > Princeton University Library > and > Palmer School of Library & Information Science, Long Island University > dgoodman@princeton.edu >
- References:
- journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Prev by Date: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Next by Date: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Prev by thread: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Next by thread: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Index(es):