[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- To: "'espositoj@att.net '" <espositoj@att.net>, "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu '" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:59:45 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Quite. But isn't that exactly what's wrong with the conventional model for research publishing? Jan Velterop -----Original Message----- From: espositoj@att.net To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: 1/18/03 12:30 AM Subject: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures If it were true that journals were indeed priced by the article, there might be something to this analysis, but journals are not priced that way, any more than music CDs are priced by the song. Nor are they priced as a strict function of cost. They are (mostly) priced as a function of several factors, including costs, risk, invested capital, and market opportunity. The biggest expense is in finding customers--call this marketing--which is very difficult in a world that is awash in published research. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: What if open access publishers close down
- Next by Date: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Prev by thread: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Next by thread: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Index(es):