[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ALA etc. Request "Broadcast Flag" Reply Extension
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: ALA etc. Request "Broadcast Flag" Reply Extension
- From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 23:53:16 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
(From the FCC ECFS site. PDF text pasted below. -- Seth) http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6513398794 In the Matter of ) ) Digital Broadcast Copy Protection ) MB Docket No. 02-230 ) ) To: The Commission The American Library Association, the American Association of Law Libraries, the Association of Research Libraries, the Medical Library Association, and the Special Library Association (collectively "Libraries") hereby request a sixty (60) day extension of time in which to file reply comments to the FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding Digital Broadcast Copy Protection (MB Docket No. 02-230). Interested parties, including the Libraries, filed comments on December 6, 2002. Under the schedule established by the Commission in the NPRM reply comments are due to be filed January 17, 2003. If this extension is granted, reply comments will be due to be filed on March 17, 2003. For the reasons set forth below, the Libraries respectfully request that this request be granted. This NPRM raises important issues that may affect the ability of the public to access and use information distributed and/or maintained in a digital format. The importance and significance of this rule making is, in part, reflected by the more than 6,500 comments that have been filed. There are literally thousands of pages that need to be reviewed carefully and the current schedule does not allow adequate time for that review, much less the preparation of thoughtful reply comments. Indeed, a cursory review of a portion of the filed comments indicate numerous policy and public issues of interest to the Libraries as well as many other commenters which warrant detailed and thoughtful replies. Thus, due to the volume of the filed comments to be reviewed and the complex and important issues raised by the Broadcast Flag rule making, the Libraries believe that an extension of time to and including March 17, 2003 is necessary and appropriate. Respectfully submitted, The American Library Association The American Association of Law Libraries The Association of Research Libraries The Medical Libraries Association The Special Libraries Association By___________________ Professor Peter Jaszi Professor Richard Ugelow Akua Coppock Piper Nieters Gunther Oakey Samantha Thompson Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic 4801 Massachusetts, NW Suite 417 Washington, DC 20016-8184 202-274-4148 December 19, 2002
- Prev by Date: Ad Hoc Committee re. RoweCom / Call for Library & Publisher Members
- Next by Date: When a society journal changes publisher
- Prev by thread: When a society journal changes publisher
- Next by thread: Ad Hoc Committee re. RoweCom / Call for Library & Publisher Members
- Index(es):