[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
walk-in users & open access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: walk-in users & open access
- From: "Heather Morrison" <hmorrison@ola.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:59:42 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The public and academic libraries I've used and worked at throughout my lifetime have always allowed people to walk in and use almost all print materials onsite, without question or authentication. There are some exceptions, of course, for special collection materials and that sort of thing. Patron identity only becomes an issue when transactions with financial or possible financial consequences occur (e.g. loaning books, printing, photocopying, interlibrary loans), or when dealing with heavy demand materials i.e. reserves. As a number of Liblicense contributors have pointed out, these kinds of considerations requiring patron identity often come into play in relation to electronic materials. Many public libraries, for example, must impose time limits on computer use, due to heavy demand for their resources. The reason is in order to ensure that these scarce resources are shared in a fair manner; this requires authentication. Assigning a temporary ID to a walk-in user is very reasonable under these circumstances. And most libraries cannot afford to provide free printing or photocopying. Then there are vendors who won't provide walk-in access, and libraries who must provide these materials to their own clients. I would agree that current pricing models often result in larger libraries purchasing limited simultaneous users, which forces them to ensure their own clients needs are met. Ironically, it's not unusual for smaller libraries to be able to afford unlimited access for exactly the same materials. The solution, which I'm sure vendors and libraries will figure out in time, is pricing models which allow large libraries to purchase unlimited access at realistic prices. There are probably cultural differences as well; in some libraries and/or countries, the norm might be checking in when you arrive at the library, but in other libraries and/or countries, the norm might be self-help. However, given the practical reasons why authentication may more often be necessary for electronic than for print materials, I would like to suggest that the philosophical arguments for providing open access are exactly the same regardless of format. Many libraries would not dream of demanding to know a patron's identity before the person looked up print material in an open collection. Why then, is it so difficult to even imagine the same situation with electronic resources? a personal opinion by: Heather Grace Morrison Project Coordinator BC Electronic Library Network ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone: 604-431-3019 Toll free: 1-800-663-1663 x3019 Fax: 604-431-3381 Email: hmorrison@ola.bc.ca Web: http://www.eln.bc.ca
- Prev by Date: Re: FBI's reading list worries librarians
- Next by Date: Re: Simultaneous users models
- Prev by thread: RE: Faxon / Divine
- Next by thread: RE: walk-in users & open access
- Index(es):