[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FBI's reading list worries librarians
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: FBI's reading list worries librarians
- From: martin@skmassociates.net
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:00:19 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
While it may not be written policy per se, I think that if you looked at the RFPs that large numbers of libraries issue prior to purchasing an integrated library system, you would find that these libraries require the ability to link a book and a user while the user has that book in circulation, but that the RFP specifically states that the identification of the user is eradicated upon return of the book. At most, statistical information is retained (was it a student or a faculty member, a graduate or undergraduate, a friend of the library?) but nothing that could allow the library to tell the FBI or any other agency that a specific person has borrowed a specific item. Sue Martin Susan K. Martin, Ph.D. President, SKM Associates, Inc. 10 Colonial Farm Circle Marstons Mills, MA 02648 o: 508-420-0224 f: 508-420-1588 ___ On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:08:42 -0800 (PST), "James A. Robinson" wrote: > My personal opinion is that it is good these lawsuits are being filed. > I am wondering if libraries have any sort of policy where use records > are deleted after the library has no more need of them? > > An example would be that you must necessarily track that a book X is > loaned out to person Y, but after the book is returned you may only > need to have on record that book Y was used N many times in a year.
- Prev by Date: RE: Simultaneous users models
- Next by Date: walk-in users & open access
- Prev by thread: Re: FBI's reading list worries librarians
- Next by thread: Re: FBI's reading list worries librarians
- Index(es):