[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Shrinkwrap contract on books
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Shrinkwrap contract on books
- From: "Peter Picerno" <ppicerno@nova.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:46:34 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The intended effect might be to scare us away from using our legal rights but perhaps a more tangible effect would be that of scaring customers away from products! I mean, who's going to buy a book if you're liable to end up in jail (or paying a fine or at the very least mortgaged to the hilt for the rest of your life to pay off lawyer's fees) because you loaned it to someone else to read?? I would think that especially for law libraries such a license would effectively end their ability to purchase anything published by the association in question!! Peter Picerno -----Original Message----- Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:54 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Shrinkwrap contract on books and it seems that the professional attorney would advise: > it will be interesting to see what happens next But I am glad to say I have confirmed from the ALA pages on UCITA that it does not affect books, unless they are packaged with computer software. I am not giving advice, but It would appear than the attorneys of the Delaware Bar Association must think their shrink-wrap license has some effect. The effect intended may be to try to to scare us away from using our legal rights. David Goodman
- Prev by Date: Ruling Could Extend Reach of Libel Law
- Next by Date: RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President
- Prev by thread: Re: Shrinkwrap contract on books
- Next by thread: FW: Morgan Stanley on the STM Publishing market
- Index(es):