[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Removal of articles from ScienceDirect
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Removal of articles from ScienceDirect
- From: "Menefee, Daviess (ELS)" <D.Menefee@elsevier.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:57:45 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Cross-posted at the request of the moderator. Please forgive any duplication. Dear Readers of this List, Several concerns have been raised recently on this [reedelsevier from U of Texas] listserve regarding the removal of articles from ScienceDirect after they have appeared in electronic format. These concerns arise in the course of debate over digital archiving and what will be in the archive in the future. To try to address some of these concerns, Elsevier Science has recently established a formal procedure for the removal of articles. To that end there is now in place a strict internal policy of review before any article is removed and that review must include senior publishing management and the legal department. Only under extraordinary circumstances can an article be removed (e.g., plagiarism, scientific misconduct, gross error such that human safety is at risk) and then a statement is inserted to indicate the removal. For the sake of complete digital archiving, Elsevier Science has included ALL of its electronically published articles in its recent agreement with the Royal Dutch Library (Koninklijke Bibliotheek). As libraries' expectations have risen with respect to digital archiving, Elsevier has put in place processes and procedures to meet those expectations. With kind regards, Daviess Menefee Library Relations
- Prev by Date: Publisher PR Campaign
- Next by Date: RE: Harvard Business Review online access
- Prev by thread: RE: digest 1053/Harvard Business Review
- Next by thread: Publisher PR Campaign
- Index(es):