[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question re: Lessig and the Creative Commons project
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Question re: Lessig and the Creative Commons project
- From: David Wiley <dw2@opencontent.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:11:08 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On 10/1/02 3:39 PM, Bolick, Bob taunted me by saying: > Glad to see the info-wants-to-be-free crowd actually endorsing licensing > and respect for copyright. ;-) This is an interesting perspective. I've seen the formation of things like OpenContent and later Creative Commons much more as a preemptive strike by the info-wants-to-be-free crowd to provide legal guarantees that info can be free when info-ought-to-be-owned folks try to come in and make a variety of claims against information that the free crowd tries to make available. This was certainly my motive in obtaining a contractual agreement to a specific license before agreeing to publish my last book. I had fears that the publisher would eventually come back to the info-ought-to-be-owned mindset. Once we had an agreement that the Open Publication License would be used, which meant that I could provide a free electronic copy of the book online, I could contribute with peace of mind... Just another perspective ;) David -- David Wiley, PhD Assistant Professor Instructional Technology Utah State University http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/
- Prev by Date: FW: Complimentary Trial Access to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Journals
- Next by Date: Re: big deal
- Prev by thread: Re: Question re: Lessig and the Creative Commons project
- Next by thread: Re: Question re: Lessig and the Creative Commons project
- Index(es):