[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- From: "rrhoon.mail.ncsu.edu" <robert_hoon@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:22:22 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As I said, both parties, including the library, believe their interpretation of applicable copyright would prevail. The publisher is no doubt claiming a compilation copyright. You have raised a separate issue; I was not under the impression that consideration was at issue or a claim that value was disproportionate with the resources provided. Your hypothetical presents issues of undisputed fraud, not a question of statutory interpretation. I think we are now discussing the chasm between the philosophical and the pragmatic. I agree philosphically, but if they want the resource, your are not going to first resolve something as controversial as compilation copyright in order to execute the license. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Goodman" <dgoodman@princeton.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 10:22 PM Subject: Re: Copyright of previous public domain > What you see as > > > an attempt by both parties to > > agree upon benign language now, to get the license executed, > > I see as an attempt by one party to claim rights they do not own. > > I could sell you all the rights I have to all the houses on my block. I do > own one house, and the contract would I suppose be effective for it. If I > have previously misled you to think I have some rights in the others, and > you have paid me on that basis, one doesn't have to be a lawyer to know an > appropriate category for what I've done. If the total price I ask is fair > for my own house, then it _is_ a question for a lawyer. I do know that if > I try to sell property on this basis, most prudent people would think it > unwise to buy from me. > > For general background on database protection, a good place to start is a > posting on this list from the ALA > http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0208/msg00071.html (see > item 2) But I do agree that the appropriate rights in a database do or > should depend on the details of the content of the database.
- Prev by Date: Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- Next by Date: Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- Prev by thread: Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- Next by thread: Re: Copyright of previous public domain
- Index(es):