[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: big deal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: big deal
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:58:43 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I strongly suspect your terms are pretty much the same as they offer to everyone. As you say, One percent isn't very much -- depending on the journal, it can be half a journal a year for even a very large library. Being able to exchange one journal for another is not what I call cancelling--but I do agree that it is a good feature and one we plan to make use of. David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Sciences Bibliographer Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu 609-258-7785 ___ On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Tom Williams wrote: > We have it in our Science Direct and other agreements that we can cancel > all or some titles if budget problems mandate it. Also, we can eliminate > up to 1% of our total amount spent each year. Not much and for us comes > to about 1 title per year. Still it's something. How restrictive or not > your license is can depend very much on how well you can negotiate and how > much clout your institution or consortia has. Another reason why my > mantra continues to be "develop national guidelines for licensing." MLA, > SLA, ALA, et al, where are you? > > Thomas L. Williams, M.S.L.S, A.H.I.P, Director > C.M. Baugh Biomedical Library > and Media Production Services. > University of South Alabama, BLB 326, Mobile, Al 36688 > tel. (251)460-6885 > fax. (251)460-7638 > twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu
- Prev by Date: DOJ is prepared to begin prosecuting peer-to-peer pirates
- Next by Date: E-Archiving Agreement/Royal Dutch Library & Elsevier Science
- Prev by thread: Re: big deal
- Next by thread: RE: big deal
- Index(es):