[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Copyright as Cudgel
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Copyright as Cudgel
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:13:08 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Siva Vaidhyanathan's article is a most important one! Thank you, Bernie Sloan, for bringing it to wider attention. A few brief quotes: - "...fair use, while not quite dead, is dying." - "...everyone who reads [...] does research, or teaches should be up in arms." - "The real question is why so few people are complaining." - "...the DMCA [...] has managed to stifle [...] beneficial uses of material for research and teaching." - "...we academics have been painfully slow to argue against abuses in and of copyright law." - "Academics have more to lose in the copyright wars than most people do." - "We [academics] have a vested interest in keeping information flowing as cheaply, widely, and quickly as possible." - "...while academics have slept, the content industries have systematically stifled flows of essential information, created artificial scarcity, and made certain areas of basic research potentially illegal." The apparent indifference to these issues in academe is no less than astonishing. Librarians may have a clearer interest, but they could and should do more to inform the actual researchers of the imminent dangers and rally them to the cause. References like this one to Vaidhyanathan's article simply do not appear on academic research listservs. But they ought to. Academic researchers have the most to lose and are in one of the best positions to make changes happen. At least for primary research there is potentially a solution, even if efforts to change copyright law fail (the most likely outcome, unfortunately). That is to change the way scholarly communication is paid for from the currently prevailing system in which 'information' is sold, to one where the 'service of publishing' is sold. The former system requires transfer of copyright to the publisher (or at least requires an exclusive licence to publish), whereas the latter can leave copyright unreservedly with the author. As it is in the academic authors' interest to have their research articles disseminated as widely as possible, they will want to be acknowledged as authors, but otherwise remove all restrictions to the use of their aticles. For this material, 'all use is fair use' would apply. Some - although unfortunately very few - publishers already work along this principle which results in 'open access' to the research material they publish on the internet. BioMed Central (of which I am the publisher) is one. But the practice should be far more widespread if the dangers presented by the restrictive trends in copyright law are to be averted. What needs to happen? - Tenure committees, funding bodies, assessment bodies, et cetera, need to stimulate authors to publish in open access journals rather than thwart it, as still happens too often by requiring them to publish in conventional journals (the ones with a strong vested interest in reducing fair use!). - Academic authors need to stop transferring their copyright to the journals in which they publish, and at least reserve the right to make their articles freely available on the internet (for instance on their institutional public server). If this is refused, they should offer a payment to the publisher for the 'service of publishing' in return for full, free, open access to their article (about $500 emerges as an acceptable and realistic amount) and request their funding body or institution to pick up the bill for that (a very small amount if compared to the amount currently paid per article - in the aggregate, in subscription or licensing charges - by academia, which is in the order of $3500 to $7000, or 7 to 14 times as much, depending on the discipline). - Librarians can help, drawing the attention of the above constituencies to the urgency of these issues. Jan Velterop Publisher BioMed Central Ltd. Tel +44 (0)20 7323 0323 www.biomedcentral.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Sloan, Bernie [mailto:bernies@uillinois.edu] > Sent: 31 July 2002 03:41 > To: 'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu' > Subject: Copyright as Cudgel > > > There's an interesting opinion piece on copyright and the Digital > Millennium Copyright Act in the August 2 issue of the > Chronicle of Higher > Education: > > Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Copyright as cudgel. Chronicle of Higher > Education, > 48(47), pp. B7-B9. August 2, 2002. > http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i47/47b00701.htm > > The author is an assistant professor of information studies at the > University of Wisconsin at Madison. > > Bernie Sloan > Senior Library Information Systems Consultant > University of Illinois Office for Planning and Budgeting > 338 Henry Administration Building > 506 S. Wright Street > Urbana, IL 61801 > > Phone: (217) 333-4895 > Fax: (217) 265-0454 > E-mail: bernies@uillinois.edu
- Next by Date: Blackwell Publishing Online Journals Pricing Structure for 2003
- Prev by thread: Blackwell Publishing Online Journals Pricing Structure for 2003
- Index(es):