[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:27:00 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Wait a minute, Jan. Do you mean that if I were to take selected excellent articles from your publications, and reprint them as an anthology, and sell them in hard copy for my own profit, you (and the authors) would consider this fair? Agreed, this very very rarely happens. Practically the only publisher who has in recent years done this on a more or less regular basis is Scientific American, which of course is not a primary research publication. But what if a profit-making commercial enterprise wanted to reprint 50,000 copies of an article involving one of their products and use it as a sales promotion? David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Sciences Bibliographer Princeton University Library dgoodman @princeton.edu 609-258-7785 On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jan Velterop wrote: [SNIP] > All use is fair use. At least for research published by BioMed Central. > > Jan Velterop > Publisher BioMed Central
- Prev by Date: Re: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- Next by Date: FW: UPDATE: ISI product access
- Prev by thread: RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- Next by thread: RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- Index(es):