[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:23:46 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Useful as the aggregators are in some ways, those who thought that they were buying journals rather than temporary access should now understand the position--for Sage as well as other publishers David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Sciences Bibliographer Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu 609-258-7785 On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ann Okerson wrote: > Comments from Carol Richman (carol.richman@sagepub.com) > ******* > > There has been much communication today regarding Sage's position with > EBSCO and ProQuest and our participation in the database aggregated > products produced by both companies. I would like to clarify Sage's > position: > > A Statement from Sage Publications: > > Sage Publications would like to clarify our position with respect to both > EBSCO and ProQuest. We have decided to remove our content from the > aggregated databases known as EBSCOhost and ProQuest. This decision is > effective at the end of this year, but EBSCO and ProQuest will continue to > fulfill subscriptions to their conclusion up until the end of 2003. We > have taken this decision, which we recognize will disappoint some in the > library community, after almost 10 years of experimenting with aggregated > databases. > > First, the increasing substitution of the databases for actual journal > subscriptions jeopardizes the continued viability of our journal > publishing program. Journals cannot sustain themselves without income > from subscriptions. Unfortunately, the royalties earned from EBSCOhost > and ProQuest are not substantial enough to support the cost of publishing > a journal. We would potentially be confronted with ceasing publication of > a number of titles. Decreasing the amount of available scholarly > research will not serve the academic community well. > > Second, we believe that our current and future electronic publishing plans > for Sage journals will provide great benefits to the library community, as > we will describe below. We want to ensure our customers that electronic > access to all Sage journals will continue via our existing arrangements > with Ingenta, Swets-Blackwell, Divine, Hans Huber, Minerva, OCLC, and > EBSCO Online. Thus, any institution that subscribes to a Sage journal > will have electronic access, as we recognize that the availability of > electronic content is critical to the academic community. > > Please know that we intend continued relationships with EBSCO, through > EBSCO Online, and with ProQuest, through their microform/microfiche > program. > > Additionally, Sage Publications has recently announced an exciting new > online product for Sage journals, The Sage Full-text Collections, to be > released in January 2003. The Collections will be subject specific > databases in the areas of Communication Studies, Criminology, Sociology, > and Politics and International Relations. Each Collection will contain the > full-text of all of the journals we publish in that discipline, including > a current subscription and up to 20 years of back files with full linking > backward and forward. Each Collection will be hosted on a platform > enabling key word search functionality, browsing functionality, and > reference and citation linking capability. The Collections are designed to > be dynamic research tools for students and faculty members in the social > sciences. Sage currently plans to release new Collections in new > disciplines each year. > > Sage has a long history of providing social science research to the > academic community, and our goal and intention is to continue that > tradition for librarians, faculty members, and students. Please bear with > us as we make the transition from EBSCOhost and ProQuest databases to Sage > Full-Text Collections.
- Prev by Date: Congress holding DRM hearing and want your comments
- Next by Date: RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- Prev by thread: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- Next by thread: Re: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- Index(es):