[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proteome BioKnowledge Library License
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Proteome BioKnowledge Library License
- From: jwatson <jwatson@mail.pratt.lib.md.us>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:44:58 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I do strike this out as a matter of course, although I have not dealt with this vendor. As a public institution, I don't believe that we can keep financial matters confidential, it needs to be a matter of public record. I haven't had any problems in the past. Jamie Watson Enoch Pratt Free Library Baltimore, MD 21201 Phil Davis wrote: > Dear Liblicense, > > Has anyone signed the license Incyte's Proteome database? While there are > some of the usual suspects in the license (governing law, legal fees, > indemnity), the clause that gives me the biggest willies is this one: > > 8.1 Institution agrees that the Fees set forth in this Agreement shall be > considered confidential information and safeguarded hereunder by > Institution for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date. > > Has anyone struck out gag clauses like this? > > Thanks for any advice, > --Phil > > Philip Davis, Life Sciences Bibliographer > pmd8@cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: First draft COUNTER Usage Reports available for feedback now - Librarians, please take part in the online survey!
- Next by Date: Re: digest 959
- Prev by thread: Re: Proteome BioKnowledge Library License
- Next by thread: Re: Proteome BioKnowledge Library License
- Index(es):