[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DMCA alternatives
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: DMCA alternatives
- From: "Chris Zielinski" <informania@supanet.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:05:51 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Friends, This note is in regard to "a right of access". Technically, fair use/dealing is not considered a right, but an exception to copyright - this might be splitting hairs, since most discussions of copyright treaties - notably the European Copyright Directive (ECD) and the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) - group "rights and exceptions" as a single category. It should be noted that the ECD requires rightsholders to provide mechanisms for circumvention for fair use exemptions, while the WCT allows for existing exemptions, and the circumvention clause is written in such a way as to allow for fair use. On another list, my friend Mark Perkins noted that "in the USA, things are slightly different due to the Constitutional restriction on copyright legislation." Although in the DMCA there is a provision for review of exceptions by the US Librarian of Congress, "the first review came out against expanding exemptions, and the cases so far seem to point in that direction too. This may go all the way to the Supreme Court, perhaps on the basis of whether DMCA 1201 is an end-run around the Copyright Clause in the US Constitution, and is thus pre-empted." More broadly, there are very few examples of a right of access to information of any kind, anywhere - exceptions include Freedom of Information provisions granted under some national jurisdictions. The main international instruments relating to human rights are largely silent on the matter or contain, as is typical with such documents, nothing but mealy-mouthed generalisations about "the right to education" or "the right to knowledge". These are very rarely translated into anything tangible (but see the very rarely applied 1971 Paris revisions to Berne, which allow developing countries the right to translate and re-publish, by statutory licence if necessary, "educational materials"). For some years now, I have been campaigning for the recognition of a category of "essential information" - in the sense of "information essential for human development" to which an access right should be granted. This proposed expansion of the public domain is much broader than an exception for fair use. I have been pleased to see this beginning to appear in such works in progress as Unesco's draft recommendation on Multilingualism and Universal Access in Cyberspace (which can be found and commented on through http://www.unesco.org/webworld/). That recommendation, by the way, includes the following recently added amendment: "M29 - Member States should work to ensure that the principle of fair use is not weakened through inappropriate use of technical means to restrict access or ensure security. In particular, Member States are encouraged in their national and international deliberations on intellectual property laws to ensure free access to public domain information (such as statistical, regulatory, environmental and safety-related information) which is essential for citizens in a modern democratic society." Chris Zielinski Principal Consultant, Informania Ltd and Director, Information Waystations and Staging Posts Network Tel: Home: 0044-1730-301297 Office: 0044-1730-710324 Mobile: 0797-10-45354 Fax: 0044-1730-265398 e-mail: informania@supanet.com web site: www.iwsp.org
- Prev by Date: Re: meaning of "systematic"
- Next by Date: Re: Lippincott journals only on ovid platform?
- Prev by thread: RE: DMCA alternatives
- Next by thread: ill and license agreement
- Index(es):