[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Contract clash adds to Oracle woes
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Contract clash adds to Oracle woes
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:51:50 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Contract clash adds to Oracle woes By Reuters May 6, 2002, 5:40 AM PT http://news.com.com/2100-1001-899390.html At a time when Oracle was already grappling with slumping sales, a key executive departure and a stock price hovering near three-year lows, the No. 2 software maker has now become embroiled in a controversy over a deal with the state of California. snip For months, there have been lingering questions over the deal, since it was not subject to competitive bidding and few state departments had expressed a need for the software. The uproar over the transaction gained momentum in mid-April, when the state's auditor said the contract, which has an initial term of six years, would end up costing taxpayers $41 million more than if the state had used another purchasing method. snip It's the deal, not the software The latest software controversy is not about the quality of the software, but about the state's ability to make savvy technology purchases, Greenbaum said. The state was negotiating with Oracle in the final days of the company's fiscal year, when sales representatives are eager to book deals and, therefore, more likely to OK discounts. "That's the time of the year when you can get the best deal out of a software vendor," said Greenbaum, who added that the Oracle contract appeared to be a "pretty good deal" for the state based on the very limited information available. "If other government vendors are smart, they're not going to make the same mistake that California did, and they're going to get the same price that California did," he said. --end--
- Prev by Date: Ian Clarke's peer-to-peer debate
- Next by Date: When can an article be "withdrawn"?
- Prev by thread: Re: When can an article be "withdrawn"?
- Next by thread: Ian Clarke's peer-to-peer debate
- Index(es):