[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ian Clarke's peer-to-peer debate
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Ian Clarke's peer-to-peer debate
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:48:45 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
By John Borland Staff Writer, CNET News.com May 6, 2002, 8:30 AM PT http://news.com.com/2008-1082-899662.html snip. CNET News.com recently talked to Clarke about Freenet and the continuing peer-to-peer debates. Q: The landscape has changed considerably since you started the project, both in terms of legal rulings and the other types of programs people are using. Do you see the need for Freenet as strong as it ever was? A: I think more so. Freenet was very much a thought experiment initially. It was what would happen if the Internet ever came under significant attack from powerful organizations or government. One of the interesting things is, that theory has repeatedly become reality. When I was first dreaming up Freenet, I never thought a software engineer would be jailed for writing a piece of software that let people read PDF documents. I never thought the Digital Millennium Copyright Act would be enforced in the way that it is. I never thought that senators would be proposing bills that would mandate digital rights management (DRM) technology in all computers--effectively, in my view, crippling all computers... --end--
- Prev by Date: tech workers cost less.
- Next by Date: Contract clash adds to Oracle woes
- Prev by thread: Contract clash adds to Oracle woes
- Next by thread: tech workers cost less.
- Index(es):