[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Barriers to e-access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Barriers to e-access
- From: Priscilla Stephenson <pstephenson@utmem.edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:46:47 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Micromedex requires access be limited to our students and faculty....This is for the free access they provide us because we have a pharmacy program. I don't know about full-pay licenses. Priscilla L. Stephenson Coordinator, Reference Services UTHSC Health Sciences Library 877 Madison Ave.; Memphis, TN 38163 901-448-5404; voicemail -5401; FAX -7235 pstephenson@utmem.edu > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Woodward, Hazel" <H.Woodward@cranfield.ac.uk> > To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:46 AM > Subject: FW: Barriers to e-access > > Message forwarded from Mary Heaney at Wolverhampton University, UK. > > *** > > Dear colleagues > > I'm working with the Higher Education Funding Council for England on a > paper for the Research Support Libraries Group about "Resolving barriers > to e-access" and would value some hard data on the proportion of > individually-negotiated licences (not standard licences such as the NESLI > Model Licence) which do not permit walk-in users. We are particularly > interested in specific data about uncooperative publishers in this regard, > are there any well-known names? > > Mary
- Prev by Date: Publishers List for E-Reserves
- Next by Date: Re: Barriers to e-access
- Prev by thread: Re: Barriers to e-access
- Next by thread: Re: Barriers to e-access
- Index(es):