[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Time to re-write the DMCA
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Time to re-write the DMCA
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:24:12 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
http://news.com.com/2010-1078-825335.html Time to rewrite the DMCA By Rick Boucher January 29, 2002, 12:00 PM PT A sample of: To counter this emerging threat to traditionally accepted fair-use values, Congress must rewrite the law. We should begin by revising section 1201, which is at the heart of the Felten and 2600 magazine litigations, and which can be used to keep library patrons from copying even a paragraph from a book without making a separate payment. The only conduct that should be declared criminal is circumvention for the purpose of infringing a copyright. That approach would provide adequate protection for copyright owners without abridging the legitimate fair-use rights of consumers, libraries, educators and other users. --end of excerpt--
- Prev by Date: More on copyright, Music labels and Napster
- Next by Date: Institutional Access to Lancet Online
- Prev by thread: Re: Institutional Access to Lancet Online
- Next by thread: More on copyright, Music labels and Napster
- Index(es):