[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BioMed Central is NOT an Elsevier enterprise
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: BioMed Central is NOT an Elsevier enterprise
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:36:54 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Readers of Liblicense, Most unfortunately we still regularly hear comments of which the following is an example: "...discussion at our meeting revolved around the firm presence of Elsevier behind the creation of BioMed Central. If the pattern of recent history were to repeat itself in an author-payment dominated model of commercial publishing, smaller research organisations might find themselves lacking sufficient cash even to publish their research externally, let alone subscribe to collected output..." Let me state clearly and categorically that BioMed Central and Elsevier have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with one another. Sure enough, BioMed Central is a commercial enterprise and part of the Current Science Group ( www.current-science-group.com <http://www.current-science-group.com> ), but the business model chosen for the publication of primary papers practically guarantees profits to be fair (and much smaller than the roughly one third or more of turnover that some traditional STM publishers have realised for decades; we certainly don't expect our profits - when we reach profitability - to top 10%). This is not because we decided that we want to change human nature, but because the BioMed Central model will be truly open to substantial and widespread competition (unlike the traditional STM model) with relatively low entry barriers, and so the profit margins will stay low. That is the real guarantee to the scientific community of the huge financial savings that will result if the model of publishing primary data will move from charging users (where the publishers have an effective monopoly on the actual papers they publish, leading to a severe limitation of choice for the libraries and to the high prices so common in traditional STM publishing) to charging authors (where many service providers can compete for the authors' business, thus keeping the prices low). If the model of charging at the input side (authors) gains wider currency, we expect that the world wide publishing cost (read: publishers' turnover) per primary paper will drop by a factor of 10 or thereabouts compared to what it is now. With regard to publishing science information that is not primary (in other words, outside the 'publish or perish' sphere), there is true choice for libraries and readers, and BioMed Central will price its products according to their economic value, success depending directly on the quality of services offered. For more information about BioMed Central and its product range see www.biomedcentral.com <http://www.biomedcentral.com> . Jan Velterop BioMed Central BioMed Central www.biomedcentral.com <http://www.biomedcentral.com/>
- Prev by Date: 3rd European ICOLC in Finland 29.11.-1.12.2001
- Next by Date: RE: NEJM
- Prev by thread: Licensing Workshop for Publishers
- Next by thread: 3rd European ICOLC in Finland 29.11.-1.12.2001
- Index(es):