[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: licence under 2 laws?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: licence under 2 laws?
- From: "Lesley Ellen Harris" <lesley@copyrightlaws.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:44:38 -0500
- References: <200107022017.QAA23125@gr.its.yale.edu>
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicensel-l@lists.yale.edu
Pam, what's the wording of that clause...as it may be that one country is for the governing law under which the license is to be interpreted and the one country is the country where any litigation would actually take place. Lesley ----- Original Message ----- From: Pam Davies <lib6pmd@library.novell.leeds.ac.uk> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:15 PM Subject: licence under 2 laws? > Colleagues, > > We have been asked to sign a licence which says that it is governed by > both US and UK copyright laws, and that "Customer acknowledges that it and > its Users have no right to make copies [....] except to the extent > permitted by such copyright laws." > > Where the two laws differ, how does that leave us and our readers: if > something would be permitted under one law and not the other, does our > User have the right to do it or not? Any thoughts, especially from UK > colleagues? > > Pam > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Pam Davies, IPR and Projects Officer, > Edward Boyle Library, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK > p.m.davies@leeds.ac.uk tel: 0113 233 5543 fax: 0113 233 5539 >
- Prev by Date: BioMed Central Considers Author Charges
- Next by Date: Library Consortia IFLA Preconference
- Prev by thread: licence under 2 laws?
- Next by thread: RE: licence under 2 laws?
- Index(es):