[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Aggregator Embargoes -- more info
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Aggregator Embargoes -- more info
- From: Stefanie Wittenbach <stefw@pop.ucr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 19:27:22 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>For these titles, the full text >holdings statements on EBSCO's title lists and MARC records, which many of >us are putting in our catalogs and on our web pages, says "to present." I don't know why this is any more disconcerting than our print checkin/holdings records listing currently received, open-ended holdings range, etc. Many print titles are suspended, delivered late, or published very infrequently, so our holdings statements are somewhat misleading for them too. I think I have to agree that some full-text is better than nothing. Perhaps better wording would be a simple "Check website for coverage" statement rather than actual holdings. We use actual holdings, but for GPO records, we use the generic statement. I don't have feedback from patrons on which is preferred or how bothered they are about lack of online coverage. It would be interesting to do a survey/focus group with patrons about e-journals. Stefanie ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stefanie Wittenbach Head of Acquisitions University Library University of California, Riverside P.O. Box 5900 Riverside, CA 92517 909/787-2805 909/787-3720 fax
- Prev by Date: Education Law Institute
- Next by Date: RE: Aggregator Embargoes -- more info
- Prev by thread: RE: Aggregator Embargoes -- more info
- Next by thread: RE: Aggregator Embargoes -- more info
- Index(es):