[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Nature Questions
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: FW: Nature Questions
- From: Philip Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:36:51 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Nature is basing their institutional pricing on FTE counts, which makes sense if you have a product that has (potential) use by the entire university community. In large multidisciplinary universities that include arts, social sciences, humanities and sciences, libraries are faced with a pricing model that assumes that everyone will use their journal, when in actuality, only a fraction of its users are potential Nature readers. It therefore makes a lot of sense why small medical college libraries are the only takers to the Nature deal. Medical libraries serve small user base with a potential reader base of nearly 100%. I don't blame these libraries who have taken advantage of Nature's deal....for them its a good deal. That said, it doesn't make the issue of purchasing an abridged publication any easier to swallow..... ---Phil Philip Davis, Life Sciences Bibliographer Mann Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (607) 255-7192 ; (607) 255-0318 fax pmd8@cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Nature Questions
- Next by Date: ALA's new book on electronic licensing
- Prev by thread: RE: Nature Questions
- Next by thread: RE: Nature Questions
- Index(es):