[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Yes Stephen king made a small profit
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Yes Stephen king made a small profit
- From: ANGRECO@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:11:36 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Re King and profits: In all honesty, King would have made significantly more money issuing this as a traditional book. All of the terms and conditions of his contract with Simon & Schuster have not been released publicly, but it appears "likely" he would have received an advance in the neighborhood of $3-5 million plus 50% of all profits generated by the book. Assuming a suggested list price of $25 and a discount rate in the 42%-48% range, the publisher would have netted approximately $13 per copy (at a 48% discount rate). Assuming a sell through of approximately 1 million copies, his share would have been substantial on the hardbound level. Paperback sales would have generated more revenues for the publisher and King. Foreign sales and sub rights would be additional. It is likely King holds all film rights, which could be substantial. For example, Grisham's last book sale to Hollywood generated approximately $8 million for Grisham (who holds all film rights). Of course, King has a sizable back list, and this book could sell copies for years if not decades. His fans are quite loyal. Under the terms of King's previous contract with Viking-Penguin, his advance was approximately $25 million and a percentage of the royalties. Al Greco Fordham University
- Prev by Date: Re: Yes Stephen king made a profit
- Next by Date: [DUC] DISCUSSION: Interesting Intellectual Property Debate
- Prev by thread: [DUC] DISCUSSION: Interesting Intellectual Property Debate
- Next by thread: Nature license
- Index(es):