[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ILL & Licensing questions
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: ILL & Licensing questions
- From: Carole Richter <Carole.J.Richter.8@nd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:23:50 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David, I think asking people to publish their contracts publicly *could* indeed lead to a lot of frantic arm waving, but I'm really only suggesting that ILL terms be shared. Even though they may not be absolutely consistent, it seems reasonable enough that they should be. I can't imagine that the ILL conditions would ordinarily be thought to provide special negotiated benefits. On the other hand, the publisher terms and conditions might change, and it would be useful to have an up to date site where the current terms/restrictions are posted. They are difficult enough to track individually that it might be helpful to everyone if there were a clearinghouse of ILL practices from vendor to vendor. We could even fantasize that such a central site of posted understandings might encourage vendors to emulate some of the better terms. Carole At 11:25 PM 2/2/2001 -0500, David Goodman wrote: >Carole, You ought to be right, but unfortunately it is not the case that >ILL practices are in fact consistent. Several publishers have on occassion >been willing to extend increased priviledges on an experimental basis to >certain libraries. (and also sometimes not to give it to those libraries >who dont know enough to ask.) > >I have also found it unbelievably difficult to persuade publishers not to >treat everything in every contract as confidential, even when we all know >that they are standard terms. >(I am cynical enoguh to suspect that's because they think they can delude >each of us that we are getting a unique bargain.) > >Perhaps the first step would be for those public institutions in states >where by law no contract with a public agency is confidential to simply >publish all their contracts on >the web. > >Confidentially, I have also heard of some ILL people who simply wont be >bothered. That's not the publishers fault. > >> >> Carole Richter >> Electronic Resources Coordinator >> University of Notre Dame Libraries >> (219)631-8405 >> richter.8@nd.edu
- Follow-Ups:
- An ILL contract terms clearning house?
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- An ILL contract terms clearning house?
- Prev by Date: RE: ILL & Licensing questions
- Next by Date: An ILL contract terms clearning house?
- Prev by thread: RE: ILL & Licensing questions
- Next by thread: An ILL contract terms clearning house?
- Index(es):