[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Simplifying licenses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Simplifying licenses
- From: Rick Anderson <Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 13:21:21 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Thanks very much for this clarification, Marilyn. How does the pricing work for this service? -------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro (336) 334-5281 rick_anderson@uncg.edu __________________ On Fri, 26 May 2000 19:27:02 EDT Marilyn Geller <geller@faxon.com> wrote: > We would like to take this opportunity to respond to Rick > Anderson's recent questions concerning our licensing > service. > > Rick expressed "surprise that your UC doesn't see a > material difference between contracting with Faxon to > acquire materials and contracting with Faxon to define the > terms of IUPUI's contracts with third parties." > > By the terms of our service agreement with IUPUI, we do not > "define" the terms of IUPUI's contracts with third parties. > IUPUI has used the academic single site generic license to > define the terms under which they will accept publisher > content. Using our power of attorney, we at Faxon > will negotiate with publishers and sign on IUPUI's behalf. > In cases where the publisher will not accept these terms > precisely as stated, IUPUI has given us a list of clauses > that must be in the contract, a list of clauses that are > highly desirable, and a list of clauses that are desirable. > With these lists of clauses and levels of priority, we > enter into these negotiations knowing exactly where changes > to the IUPUI license may or may not be discussed. If the > publisher's requirements and IUPUI's requirements conflict, > we will not sign the license. To do so would violate > our agreement with IUPUI. But if the publisher's > requirements and IUPUI's vary only by one or more clauses > that are "desirable" (just for example) we will sign the > license and expedite the implementation process, eliminating > much backing and forthing, (and, not incidentally, delay in > opening up access to users, which, at least in theory, is > what we are all supposed to be about). > > If the publisher requirements and IUPUI requirements are in > irreconcilable conflict, we will report back to our client > that we cannot come to terms with that particular publisher. > > The objective of the service is not for us to create the > business terms between IUPUI and its content providers. The > objective is to negotiate IUPUI's business terms as given > to us, thereby reducing the labor and time intensity of the > licensing process for our client. What makes this > service scalable is the acceptance of and use of the > generic license that eliminates the need to hunt through > variant legalese and allows us to focus on key issues. The > end result is that licensing ejournals becomes no more > difficult than buying print journals. > > We are negotiating with other clients to participate in > this service and will announce agreements as they are > completed. > > Marilyn Geller, MSLS > Strategic Program Manager > Faxon RoweCom Academic Services > 15 Southwest Park > Westwood, MA 02090
- Prev by Date: "If you're willing to take it out...
- Next by Date: Re: "If you're willing to take it out...
- Prev by thread: RE: Simplifying licenses
- Next by thread: Clarifying "the enemy"
- Index(es):