[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- From: Rick Anderson <Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:26:10 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> We *must* continue to work with publishers and vendors to > SIMPLIFY these licenses as much as possible. A number of > publishers have done so and I encourage the others to > follow. A related suggestion which I make (generally in vain) to publishers on a regular basis is this: if libraries are a significant part of your market, save yourself a lot of time and energy by creating a library version of the license up front. Otherwise, you're going to have to create a new library version every time someone like me calls you up. It's completely beyond me why publishers prefer to do business that way, and yet the majority of them seem to. -------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro (336) 334-5281 rick_anderson@uncg.edu "Which is the greater miracle: to cause a stone to speak, or a philosopher to stop speaking?" -- Overheard at the Council of Nicaea
- Prev by Date: RE: 'Confused'
- Next by Date: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Prev by thread: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Next by thread: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Index(es):