[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Online services to contiguous research part
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Online services to contiguous research part
- From: Wayne Smith <wsmith@greenwood.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:14:05 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I would chime in that Greenwood hears from customers who would rather have licenses that are based on size of community or user group; at the same time, we also hear from customers who would prefer licenses that are pegged to projected use. I'd certainly be interested in any comments on this particular point. Wayne Smith wsmith@greenwood.com On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 morganj@iupui.edu wrote: > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:30:04 EST > From: morganj@iupui.edu > Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: RE: Online services to contiguous research parts > > For this reason I prefer vendors that license by concurrent usage rather > than by size of the institution. The onus is then on the university to > protect the data and not grant priveleges to all and sundry without > careful consideration. > > Jim Morgan > morganj@iupui.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Online services to contiguous research parts
- Next by Date: Re: Online services to contiguous research parks
- Prev by thread: Re: Online services to contiguous research parks
- Next by thread: RE: Online services to contiguous research part
- Index(es):