[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unresponsive information providers
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Unresponsive information providers
- From: Victoria.Mitchell@directory.reed.edu (Victoria Mitchell)
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:23:35 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
--- You wrote: Is anyone else having this experience? Do information providers have some insight to share about this lack of responsiveness? Do librarians have ideas about how to get these deals negotiated and completed in a timely manner? --- end of quote --- I have had this experience frequently, although I do not have the time--licensing being only one of my many responsibilities--to follow up as assiduously as no doubt you do. My guess is that many info. providers are just not set up to handle this. They perhaps expect that libraries will simply accept the terms that they are given and do not have anyone who is designated to deal with negotiation and revision of contracts; or it simply isn't a high enough priority. It is extremely frustrating, though, and means that we don't have access to things that we ought to, and that those providers may not be getting the subscription money that they would if they could meet us halfway in getting a license signed. In some cases, it is a very small --perhaps society--publisher that is offering the electronic version of their journal(s) for free, but accompanied by a license agreement with a few unacceptable terms. When prevented with proposed revisions to the agreement, they have no idea how to respond. A standardized license agreement with library-friendly terms would probably particularly help that kind of organization -- if they adopted it, they wouldn't have to deal with the negotations and revisions that they don't have the staff to handle. Victoria Mitchell Reed College
- Prev by Date: Re: Unresponsive information providers
- Next by Date: RE: Unresponsive information providers
- Prev by thread: Re: Unresponsive information providers
- Next by thread: RE: Unresponsive information providers
- Index(es):