[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cambridge Journals Online
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Cambridge Journals Online
- From: W Holder <holder@library.utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:26:11 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sorry Margaret. I was simply acting out of frustration not evaluation of the CUP journals on any other basis. We would love to provide access to all the CUP titles if we could solve the username/password roadblock. When I started to read the original message that I reponded to I thought the announcement was going to be that just like Wiley Interscience, CUP was announcing that they were no longer requiring individual sign-in. See you soon, Warren Holder Electronic Information Resources Co-ordinator University Of Toronto Libraries Toronto, Ontario CANADA telephone : (416) 978-2286 fax : (416) 978-7653 e-mail : Holder@library.utoronto.ca -----Original Message----- From: MARGARET LANDESMAN [SMTP:mlandesm@library.utah.edu] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 7:16 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Cambridge Journals Online We looked at Cambridge to see if we agree with Warren that we have nothing to thank them for. They publish 157 journals - we looked at a sample of 61. The average price was $287.52, ranging from two annuals at $69 and $80 apiece to Journal of Physiology - 29 issues per year for $2298 - and Journal of Fluid Mechanics with 24 issues for $1560. We happen also to have recently updated our list of MCB journals and their prices - we looked at all 124 MCB titles and found the average price per journal in 2000 is at $2,650, up $278 per journal. When we consider renewals for 2001, we will certainly keep in mind that Cambridge is providing us with journals which cost per annum about the amount of one year;s "inflation" in an MCB title and whose most expensive journals are less expensive than the "average" MCB title. It seems to me reasonable to speculate that such a publisher , though floundering in dealing with the networked environment, might nonetheless be a better long term investment for libraries. Not with regard to this particular discussion, but in general, it seems to me odd that when a journal charges $100 for "electronic access," we frequently object. But if the electronic access is "free" and the price goes up $100, we think that is ok. Margaret Landesman
- Prev by Date: Re: Library logos for web resources
- Next by Date: Re: archiving thoughts
- Prev by thread: Re: Cambridge Journals Online
- Next by thread: RE: Cambridge Journals Online
- Index(es):