[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elsevier Web Editions license
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Elsevier Web Editions license
- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 17:05:12 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I suppose it is genetic as Ken Slagle says. He also is a human being and wants to be paid by NMSU. If NMSU decided to pay him less on the grounds that in the electronic environment researchers could reach content without his help, maybe he would be unhappy. Maybe he would be unhappy if those who actually run NMSU lost money through not acting in a businesslike way and the university closed down The businessmen (and businesswomen) who run publishing companies (many of them non-profits) face a whole range of difficulties in the economic environment. They want to maintain their profits (or surpluses). The nightmare for publishers is that networking in the end results in only one copy only of a publication being sold - the obverse of a librarian's nightmare that all content their users need is locked up by one publisher. These are nightmares of course. Lloyd Davidson explains one aspect of the problem that publishers have. Multi-site universities present a problem if there are libraries on each site and they get together and decide they only want to buy one subscription with electronic access throughout the university. Organisations like the AAAS have problems because they fear that they will lose their academic members if these members can get electronic access to full content through their universities The great majority of librarians do recognise that publishers do have a role to play, that there is a publishing function. ARL do with SPARC. They also recognise that payment is necessary to support this role/function. What publishers have to do is regard the problem as a challenge and work with libraries to find an equitable solution. Fortunately, as liblicense shows if you look at the files, an amazing amount of progress has been made on licensing and an equal amount of goodwill has made this possible. Ros knows very well that in the UK the PA/JISC licences have brought both publishers and librarians together to deal jointly with these sort of problems/challenges. As an ex-publisher, I am very pleased indeed that Ken Slagle has not been able to stop this sort of progress - or maybe he was just making a joke. Anthony Watkinson ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Slagle <keslagle@lib.NMSU.Edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 9:08 AM Subject: Re: Elsevier Web Editions license > It is not that publishers do not appreciate how electronic information is > used. They simply do not want to interrupt the flow of money from the > library's pocket to their's. As long as we try to find logic in the > behavior of businessmen and attempt to be 'nice' about this, they will > always attempt to take advantage of us. It is genetic. > > > Kennith Slagle > Head of Collection Services > University Library > New Mexico State University > Box 30006/Dept. 3475 > Las Cruces, NM 88003-8006 > Phone: 505-646-4228 > FAX: 505-646-7477 > Email: keslagle@lib.NMSU.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Cambridge Journals Online
- Next by Date: Re: Cambridge Journals Online
- Prev by thread: Re: Elsevier Web Editions license
- Next by thread: IFLA: Seeking Licensing Discussion Leaders
- Index(es):