Prometheus debate: Key figures respond to Houghton and Oppenheim

["McMillan, Jennifer " <Jennifer.McMillan@tandf.co.uk>]

Dear all,

I thought you would be interested to read the latest issue of the
Routledge journal Prometheus, which is currently freely available to
read online at:

http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=issue&issn=0810-9028&volume=28&issue=1

In this issue, Houghton and Oppenheim put forward a proposition 
for a widespread shift to Green Open Access publication of 
research, based on the Houghton Report, and the Editor, Professor 
Stuart Macdonald, gives key figures the chance to respond. Read 
the articles that form this lively and interesting debate!

Proposition:

The economic implications of alternative publishing models John 
W. Houghton; Charles Oppenheim:

http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0810-9028&volume=28&issue=1&spage=41

Responses:

The immediate practical implication of the Houghton Report: 
provide Green open access now - Stevan Harnad

Minerva's owl. A response to John Houghton and Charles 
Oppenheim's 'The economic implications of alternative publishing 
models' - Martin Hall

A commentary on 'The economic implications of alternative 
publishing models' - Steven Hall

The economic implications of alternative publishing models: views 
from a non-economist- Mary Anne Kennan

Openness in academic publication: the question of trust, 
authority and reliability - Christopher May

Prometheus is an international, multidisciplinary journal 
publishing papers on innovation, defined as the production, 
introduction and diffusion of change. Routledge is delighted to 
welcome Stuart Macdonald Professor of Information and 
Organisation, University of Sheffield, UK as its new editor for 
2010.

With best wishes,

Jennifer McMillan
Library Marketing Manager
Taylor & Francis Group Journals
Email: Jennifer.McMillan@tandf.co.uk