[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libraries and archiving
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Libraries and archiving
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:16:15 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The analogy between print and electronic is not complete. In the case of print publishing, the two functions of initial distribution and of permanent archiving are separate, and done differently. The publisher produces a specific number of physical objects, and send them to the customers. (He may retain a supply to send in the future, or not.) But once they are distributed, that role is finished. (I am not now including the functions involved in the maintainance of copyright.) The operations of organizing, preserving, storing, and servicing the items are completely unlike in the type of staffing and capital equipment needed. The publisher does not maintain stacks, or provide for public intellectual and physical access. For electronic distribution, the functions of current distribution and permanent access are the identical in all basic technical aspects. A server must be maintained; access connections must be maintained; backup must be reliably achieved; a public access interface must be developed and maintained. The same capital equipment is needed for permanent archival access as for current access; the same type of professional and technical staffing is needed. >From all technical standpoints it is therefore rational for the publishing sector to undertake provision of permanent archival access. The question is organizational: Does a publisher have sufficient commitment to the critical value of long term perpetual reliable access? Libraries have this commitment--we are trained to expect it and provide it, and we are funded on that basis by organizations that expect and intend to have very long term existence. Universities and similar organizations manage their affairs so as to make as certain as human beings can that they will continue their scholarly functions until the end of civilization. I do not think publishers--or scientific societies for that matter--usually think in these terms, and archiving by definition cannot rely on organizations with shorter range goals. -- David Goodman Biology Librarian, and Co-Chair, Electronic Journals Task Force Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: RE: Libraries and archiving (Re: RE: If electronic is to replace paper)
- Next by Date: Re: Libraries and archiving
- Prev by thread: Re: WIPO COPYRIGHT TREATY AND WIPO PERFORMANCES AND PHONOGRAMSTREATY
- Next by thread: Re: Libraries and archiving
- Index(es):