[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PEAK PROJECT & Article based subscription
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: PEAK PROJECT & Article based subscription
- From: "Wendy P. Lougee" <wlougee@umich.edu>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:26:47 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Questions have been raised and comments offered about the PEAK project. Let me offer some context-setting information about the project and then also forward a message from the project's lead on the research component. PEAK (Pricing Electronic Access to Knowledge) is a collaboration between the University of Michigan and Elsevier Science. Begun in 1997 on the heels of Elsevier's TULIP project, PEAK was developed to explore issues of pricing and product models for e-journals. PEAK was both a journal delivery service as well as a field experiment. I use the past tense here since the research/data gathering aspect of the project ended September 1. During the preceding 18 months, 12 institutions participated in the project (for a complete description of the project and participants see: http://www.lib.umich.edu/libhome/peak/). The PEAK research team developed several pricing and product models. Each participating institution was offered a different combination of these models. The three models were: 1. Traditional subscriptions: in this model an institution could purchase unlimited access to a specific journal title published by Elsevier Science. 2. Generalized subscriptions: in this model, institutions pre-paid for bundles of articles (120 articles in each bundle, represented in the system by "tokens"). As users selected articles, tokens were debited from the institution's subscription. However, all selected articles were then available at no incremental charge to the entire community of users. In other words, a single use (requiring a single token) then permitted free, community-wide access. 3. Per article purchases: in this model individuals purchased unlimited access to a specific article within all 1200 journals published by Elsevier. The per article cost increased with each of these models. Thus, articles in the traditional model were the least expensive. Generalized subscriptions offered an option for institutions to pre-pay for content that would be accessible to the entire community. This flexibility for users to draw from all 1200 journals was added value and was associated with a higher per article price than traditional subscriptions. Finally, individual articles could be purchased by individual users at the highest per article price (the value here was the ability to purchase "on demand"). Note, however, that even the per-article purchases was not a pay-per-use model; the individual has unlimited online access to the article after the initial purchase, with no incremental charge. As Karen Hunter (Elsevier) and Paul Gherman (Vanderbilt) have noted, the generalized model was novel and attractive to many institutions. In the ideal implementation of this model, institutions accumulate intellectual assets -i.e., users select articles which become part of the archival, subscription base of the institution. It reflects, perhaps, a fundamental shift in the journal construct whereby the title-specific "container" is no longer the unit of subscription. Preliminary data-including data on article re-use-- have been reported in several articles and presentations (see the above-mentioned project site for citations). The University of Michigan research team is now engaged in a data analysis phase, mining the very rich data we have gathered about use under a variety of pricing and product models. In addition to use data and transaction logs, we have data from surveys of users early and late in the project and a survey of institutional decision-makers. We anticipate disseminating our results broadly through publication, presentations, and a conference to be held at Michigan in winter 2000. In a subsequent message, I will share comments from Professor Jeff MacKie-Mason, Director of the Program in Research in Information Economics at UM's School of Information. Prof. MacKie-Mason heads up the PEAK research team that includes librarians, economists, and technologists. Wendy P. Lougee PEAK Project Director and Associate Director, University of Michigan University Library **************************************************************** Wendy P. Lougee Associate Director for Digital Library Initiatives University Library University of Michigan ph: 734-764-8016 818 Hatcher South fax: 734-763-5080 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1205 email: wlougee@umich.edu http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wlougee/ ****************************************************************
- Prev by Date: RE: Article based subscription
- Next by Date: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Re: Article based subscription]]
- Prev by thread: [Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Re: Article based subscription]]
- Next by thread: University of Western Australia Principles document on line
- Index(es):