[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SPARC and ACS
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: SPARC and ACS
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 18:21:12 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The American Chemical Society journal "Organic letters" is one of the new journals sponsored by SPARC. However, the subscription arrangments for the electronic version of this title do not seem to correspond to generally accepted standards. According to the ACS journals catalog for 2000, the pice for this title is: Print, $2300; Web (one class C subnet), $2415; Print and Web (1 class C subnet, $2760); Additional Class C subnets, $230; Site License only, $ 3795; Print and Site License, $4350. The prices represent a 20% surcharge for a single subnet, a 10% additional for each additional subnet, and a 90% surcharge for a site license. (These are the same relative prices as for all ACS journals.) What is distinctly unusual is for the basic electronic access to be restricted to one class C subnet. At any but the simplest institution, the ip address ranges have generally no corresponence with building, departments, or other logical arrangments. Even if it did, there are typically chemists in more than one such unit, and essentially no other professional organization expects extra payment in such cases -- after all, it would nowadays hardly be likely for there to be more than one print subscription per institution for such a title. If the site license is considered the basic subscription, and the type C license a special discount, the surcharge of 90% is by far the highest of any comparable organization: the American Society of Biological Chemistry was previously the highest at 40% (for comparison, the AIP has no surcharge for electronic access; the Royal Society of Chemistry has no surcharge, and even some of the competitive commercial publishers have no surcharge for basic electronic access, and none of them has a rate nearly as high as 90%.) (I am aware that a typical institution may, like mine, well have a blanket subscription, for which the rate is lower and access covers the entire campus. Why should these not be the conditions for single title subscriptions as well?) For the publisher of the most highly regarded and cited journals in its subject to have these terms argues either a lack of confidence in its publications, or a disregard for its members and customers. The subnet policy is bad in general, and the relative prices for electronic access outrageous, but my immediate concern is the SPARC sponsorship. SPARC is supposed to, I thought, both reduce costs and promote good practices. I consider it inappropriate for its sponsorship to be given to a journal published in this manner. This represents my own personal views only. (This message, first posted on the arl-ejournal list, is being also posted here at the request of the moderator. I will forward any replies received on one list to the other one also.--DG) -- David Goodman Biology Librarian, and Co-Chair, Electronic Journals Task Force Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: Re: Article based subscription
- Next by Date: Re[2]: Article based subscription
- Prev by thread: University of Western Australia Principles document on line
- Next by thread: RE: Fair use as determined by copyright holder
- Index(es):