[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Level of discussion.
- To: liblicense <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Level of discussion.
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:51:35 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
One of the contributors to our discussion of ejournals has felt it necessary to post the following: > >At this point if you are not willing to conceed any of our arguments we > >might as well just agree to disagree. We'll see where we both are a few > >evolutionary steps down the road. I too have noticed that some of the recent messages have represented what I suppose can be seen as an end-of-summer impatience. I apologize if anything I have written represents a lesser amount of cooperation than I hope to show. We are all of us in the course of an ongoing revolutionary change; some of us may wish it slower, some faster; some may think of any particular project that it offers the solution, or that it is worse than useless. But we are none of us necessarily opponents, and we can not be sure what our roles will eventually be. I would suggest that anyone who is absolutely certain of how our professional world will be in even 5 years may possibly not be seeing all the factors. We should all be agreed that we badly need additional data; there will I think be quite enough difficulties in interpreting the data without discouraging those who are providing it. I suggest that the appropriate course when presented with information that does not seem to be consistent with one's prior notions is to share and analyze the data. If, for example, the data I have been collecting does not necessarily show what I thought it would show (as is in fact the case), this will lead me to better see the limitations of my hypotheses and better understand the reality I am trying to measure, which may (or may not) lead to the reinforcement of my conclusions. We would surely not want to imitate those who refuse to engage in research that might lead to conclusions they do not want to accept. --- David Goodman Biology Librarian, and Co-Chair, Electronic Journals Task Force Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu http://www.princeton.edu/~biolib/ phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627
- Prev by Date: Re: principles and deal breakers
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier and cancellations
- Prev by thread: Model Licenses Comments
- Next by thread: Re: principles and deal breakers
- Index(es):