[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
% Institutional Sub Revenue for Journals
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: % Institutional Sub Revenue for Journals
- From: Janet Fisher <jfisher@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:17:35 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Pete, The percentage of revenue MIT Press receive from institutional subscriptions to our 40 journals varies widely among the 40 different titles on our list. Some of our journals have a larger number of individual subscriptions than institutional subscribers. The newer journals, in particular, are more dependent on individual subscription revenue than librarians might realize. Also, pricing patterns vary depending on discipline, and as journals get published more often the differential between individual and institutional prices increases (since individuals reach a price barrier above which they won't pay no matter how often the journal is published or how big the issues are!). Of the four journals I sampled, the largest percentage was 87%, the smallest was 68%. The other two were around 75%. I believe across all our journals, it would average out to be 65% from institutional subscriptions. But this is just a guess. Best, Janet Fisher Associate Director for Journals Publishing The MIT Press ******************************************* Five Cambridge Center Cambridge, MA 02142-1493 USA Phone: 617-253-2864 Fax: 617-258-5028 E-mail: jfisher@mit.edu http://mitpress.mit.edu *******************************************
- Prev by Date: DeepLinking..cyberlaw article in NYT.
- Next by Date: Library Support of Scholarly Publishing?
- Prev by thread: Re: Elsevier and cancellations
- Next by thread: DeepLinking..cyberlaw article in NYT.
- Index(es):