[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do your end-users see publishers' licenses?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Do your end-users see publishers' licenses?
- From: Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:33:44 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David, as I note that you posted this same question before and didn't get any public answers, let me at least try to provisionally answer this question. Different libraries, of course, have different practices, but for those who are making a strong effort to fulfill their responsibilities of informing users of any terms of use, the most common practice appears to be an "intermediate" descriptive web page that is reached either from a web-list of databases or the online catalog. This descriptive page often has help guide links, other related resource links, email reference links, etc. as well as terms of use synopses or links. If a publisher has a public license on a web-site, it is easy to link to it. If a publisher doesn't have confidentiality clauses in a a license, it is possible (although not necessarily trivial) to place the actual negotiated version online to be linked to. However, having an intermediate web page linking to terms of use doesn't prevent users from bookmarking the actual site instead of the intermediate page. And in the specific case you inquire about below (Z39.50), the library's intermediate page most probably also has instructions on how to configure the Z39.50 set up for that institution and resource. Once the user has the configuration instructions, they may never need to return to the intermediate web page again. Again, libraries faithfully following terms of use that specify not removing opening splash-screens, etc. would not provide configuration instructions on bypassing them, but sophisticated users can work things out for themselves. I think the main key to all this is that libraries make a best faith effort to present the users with terms of use. This will mean that at least the first time the user enters a database, they will be presented the opportunity to review the terms of use. If they choose to bypass it on later entries, there's not a whole lot anyone can do without being overly annoying or intrusive. My personal 2 cents worth for the day. ------------------------------------------------------------- Kimberly Parker Electronic Publishing and Collections Librarian Yale University Library 130 Wall Street Voice (203) 432-0067 P.O. Box 208240 Fax (203) 432-8527 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 mailto:kimberly.parker@yale.edu ------------------------------------------------------------- At 01:49 PM 4/15/99 -0400, you wrote: >Hello, > >I would be interested what the practice of your library is in the >following situation: > >Most licenses require the library to make best efforts to have end-users >comply with license terms. What do you do to show your end-users the >license of a publisher if the end-user interface (as with Z39.50) is one >which can be customized to bypass the publisher's title screen and >license? > >David Mirchin >Vice President & General Counsel >SilverPlatter Information, Inc. >dmirchin@silverplatter.com >tel: 781-769-2599, ex. 235 >fax: 781-769-8763
- Prev by Date: Re: digest 201
- Next by Date: Re: FW: Crawling publishers' sites
- Prev by thread: Do your end-users see publishers' licenses?
- Next by thread: Registering with Wiley/encyclopedias
- Index(es):