[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign
- To: MSPINELL <mspinell@aaas.org>
- Subject: Re: Developing impossible situation, Re: Authority to sign
- From: Rick Anderson <rick_anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:15:24 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> However, I suppose an analogy is possible to what credit > card companies do. Periodically, they'll issue a new set of > rules or terms. As a credit card holder, I can choose to > accept the new terms or reject them by terminating the > agreement. That feels pretty unilateral to me, though I > suppose technically, legally, it's not, since the card > holder can't be bound by the new rules against his/her will. Certainly the *action* is unilateral in the case above, but, as you point out, the agreement is still bilateral if the cardholder is notified and has the opportunity to reject the terms. The notification process should have been agreed to in advance, of course. This sort of ambiguity is one reason we (libraries) should always insist that licenses be countersigned by licensors. If I have a license agreement in my possession with original signatures on it from both my boss and the licensor, then I can be confident that what I have is the only legally binding version until we renegotiate -- my signed version would trump a subsequent, unsigned version. It also means that you'd better be sure that there isn't language in the license that might open the door to unilateral changes in the terms. > Science Online has, over the last year, significantly > liberalized its online agreement in favor of libraries and > their users. The new terms are posted online, but we haven't > gone back to those institutions who signed the earlier > agreements to either 'force' or 'ask' them to sign the new > agreement. That's because, in our case, we are willing to > honor either version of the deal. Then, at renewal time, I > would think the new terms would come into play...Does this > strike you/others as sensible? I guess as long as you're going to continue to honor the terms upon which we mutually agreed, I don't really care that much what other documents you create internally. If I've got a signed contract, any other version that you create on your own amounts to a draft proposal. The version we agree on, of course, should specify the process involved if either party wants to change the terms, and I'd expect you to follow whatever procedure we agreed to. You should expect the same of me. Rick ---------------------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro 1000 Spring Garden St. Greensboro, NC 27402-6175 PH (336) 334-5281 FX (336) 334-5399 rick_anderson@uncg.edu http://www.uncg.edu/~r_anders "All beauty today is meretricious." -- Fredric Jameson "But beauty is found in life far more than in art. If we avert our eyes to escape the seduction, what will our eyes be good for?" -- David Bromwich
- Prev by Date: Re: Authority to sign licenses: How much staff time?
- Next by Date: Digital Licensing Workshop - LA date soon approaching
- Prev by thread: Digital Licensing Workshop - LA date soon approaching
- Next by thread: No Subject
- Index(es):