[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Double Licenses" Thread
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: "Double Licenses" Thread
- From: "Sloan, Bernie" <bernies@uillinois.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:18:11 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't know about others, but I am finding the "Double Licenses" thread to be very interesting and informative. Someone may have answered this directly or indirectly, and if so, I missed it. A while ago I cited the existence of "triple licenses". The specific example I gave involved FirstSearch databases in Illinois that are subsidized by the Illinois State Library. In brief, the State Library contracts with FirstSearch to provide access to specific databases for all Illinois libaries. That's one license. Then, when the "end-user" connects with FirstSearch, they are told that if they conduct a search they are agreeing to the terms and conditions of both OCLC and the specific database vendor. Those would be the second and third licenses. My question is this: if there are discrepancies among the terms of the various licenses, what is the order of precedence? I've been assuming that the contract between the State Library and OCLC/FirstSearch comes first. Bernie Sloan Senior Library Information Systems Consultant University of Illinois Office for Planning & Budgeting 338 Henry Administration Building 506 S. Wright Street Urbana, IL 61801 Phone: (217) 333-4895 Fax: (217) 333-6355 Email: bernies@uillinois.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: "Double" Licenses
- Next by Date: RE: "Double" Licenses--enforceability of shrink-wrap and click-wrap licenses
- Prev by thread: RE: "Double" Licenses--enforceability of shrink-wrap and click-wrap licenses
- Next by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses--enforceability of shrinkwrap and clickwrap licenses
- Index(es):