[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "Double" Licenses
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: "Double" Licenses
- From: Terry Cullen <tcullen@seattleu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:46:08 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In my opinion, the end-user "click-on" license is part of an ongoing attempt by publishers to effect an end run around users' rights under the Copyright Act. It is a way for publishers to expand their rights well beyond what the copyright law grants in two ways. First, it purports to create an enforceable contract with the end user. Currently, no court has found click-on (shrinkwrap) licenses enforceable against consumers (ProCD was a commercial exploitation of a copyrighted database). However, the proposed UCC Article 2B would make such licenses enforceable, if it succeeds and is adopted in the states (unless it is found to be either unconstitutional or preempted by the Copyright Act.) Second, it has a chilling effect on users' exercise of their rights to fair use of materials. Publishers today want the right to control ALL uses of all materials they publish, while the Copyright Act grants only limited rights to copyright holders. In fact, many publishers do not even hold copyright in the materials they are trying to control, but only in the compilation of those materials. (Many American authors sell/grant only first North American publication rights or other limited rights when they sell/offer an article, and retain all other rights in their creations.) Terry Cullen Electronic Services Librarian Seattle University School of Law Library 950 Broadway Plaza, Tacoma, WA 98402-4470 Email: tcullen@seattleu.edu Phone: 253-591-7092 FAX: 253-591-6313
- Prev by Date: Double licensing and library responsibilities
- Next by Date: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Prev by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Next by thread: Re: "Double" Licenses
- Index(es):